| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Do we accept doc changes to back branches? |
| Date: | 2017-11-27 18:10:22 |
| Message-ID: | 83dbd8c2-0230-461f-d50e-b98718cc1cc0@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-hackers,
I don't recall, do we allow non-bug fix (or what constitutes a bug) for
back branches with docs? I have been reviewing the logical replication
docs and they could use some love but I need to know which branch I
should start work on.
Thanks,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-11-27 18:17:03 | Re: Do we accept doc changes to back branches? |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2017-11-27 17:56:31 | Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com |