| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |
| Date: | 2017-06-18 23:06:15 |
| Message-ID: | 87vansq4ml.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
Thomas> Thanks both for the review. New version of patch #2 attached.
I'm looking to commit this soon; if anyone has any further comment now
would be a good time to speak up.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2017-06-18 23:08:22 | Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2017-06-18 23:04:04 | Re: Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT |