| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Questions about warnings |
| Date: | 2007-01-25 13:20:10 |
| Message-ID: | 87y7nrb5v9.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> I won't claim to know the inners good enough to comment on it. Does
> "const char **" really mean that the point is const, or the pointer that
> it points to is const?
"const char **" means the character at the end of the pointer chain is
constant. Which means my previous message is misguided, ignore it, sorry. In
short, yes, this is a limitation of the const syntax in C and you have to cast
it away in this case.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-01-25 13:23:27 | Re: Recursive Queries |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-01-25 13:18:57 | Re: Questions about warnings |