| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Gripes about walsender command processing |
| Date: | 2020-09-13 23:00:26 |
| Message-ID: | 921281.1600038026@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I think that walsenders ought to report their current replication command
> as though it were a SQL command. They oughta set debug_query_string, too.
I also notice that a walsender does not maintain its ps status:
postgres 921109 100 0.0 32568 11880 ? Rs 18:57 0:51 postgres: publisher: walsender postgres [local] idle
I don't mind if we decide we don't need to reflect the walsender's
true activity, but let's not have it showing an outright lie.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-14 01:27:56 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-09-13 22:42:03 | Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir() |