| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Questionable ping logic in LogicalRepApplyLoop |
| Date: | 2020-09-04 21:41:11 |
| Message-ID: | 968097.1599255671@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> ... oh look! commit 3f60f690fac1 moved last_recv_timestamp without
> realizing that ping_sent had to get the same treatment.
Hah, I wondered if something like that had happened, but I didn't
get around to excavating in the git history yet. Thanks for doing so.
Will push a fix later.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-09-04 21:45:10 | Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir() |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-04 21:39:34 | Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir() |