| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: partition -> partitioned |
| Date: | 2018-05-17 02:48:39 |
| Message-ID: | 9857e89b-aca5-894d-2a53-5f0c97243432@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/05/17 11:40, David Rowley wrote:
> On 17 May 2018 at 13:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Commit 499be013de6 used 'partition' where it really meant 'partitioned' in
>> a few places including in a variable name. For example, what almost all
>> places call 'partitioned_rels', make_partition_pruneinfo called
>> 'partition_rels'.
>>
>> Attached a patch to make that uniform to avoid confusion.
>
> Looks good to me.
Thanks for taking a look at it.
Regards,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2018-05-17 03:30:16 | Re: Oddity in COPY FROM handling of check constraints on partition tables |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-05-17 02:40:04 | Re: partition -> partitioned |