From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans |
Date: | 2020-07-30 22:30:43 |
Message-ID: | 99228D91-75A4-4F45-927C-E4153A817AFD@yesql.se |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 1 Jul 2020, at 15:38, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Another thing I could do is decouple the patches to discuss here from
> the patches of the other thread, which should be possible and might be
> good to avoid back and forth between the two threads.
It sounds like it would make it easier for reviewers, so if it's possible with
a reasonable effort it might be worth it. I've moved this entry to the next CF
for now.
cheers ./daniel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2020-07-30 22:38:10 | Re: pg_dump --where option |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2020-07-30 22:26:36 | Re: Online verification of checksums |