From: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: OBJECT_ATTRIBUTE is useless (or: ALTER TYPE vs ALTER TABLE for composites) |
Date: | 2015-02-24 04:00:25 |
Message-ID: | 9A28C8860F777E439AA12E8AEA7694F8010B67E0@BPXM15GP.gisp.nec.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
> > Please see check_object_ownership(). It checks relation's ownership
> > if OBJECT_COLUMN, however, type's ownership is the correct check if
> > OBJECT_ATTRIBUTE.
>
> Hmm. Is there any case where the two are different?
>
AlterObjectTypeCommandTag()?
OBJECT_ATTRIBUTE makes "ALTER TYPE" tag, but "ALTER COLUMN" tag is
made with OBJECT_COLUMN.
Above two cases are all I could found.
Thanks,
--
NEC OSS Promotion Center / PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2015-02-24 04:09:54 | Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-02-24 03:58:11 | Re: OBJECT_ATTRIBUTE is useless (or: ALTER TYPE vs ALTER TABLE for composites) |