| From: | Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Preprocessor condition fix |
| Date: | 2016-04-12 13:52:10 |
| Message-ID: | AM2PR06MB0690AA5BF7D5274597A3FEA4D4950@AM2PR06MB0690.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hm, my grep found another one ...
>
> > Oh, sorry. I saw that one, but thought it was intentional because _WIN64
> > is defined automatically anyway.
>
> Oh? Then we should not need that one (the /D switch in win32.mak) at all.
> Should we just remove it?
We have both confirmed several times that nothing depends on it. I think it can go.
--
Christian
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2016-04-12 14:08:03 | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-12 13:49:11 | Re: Preprocessor condition fix |