| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Server crash due to SIGBUS(Bus Error) when trying to access the memory created using dsm_create(). |
| Date: | 2017-09-25 16:13:27 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY+pXip_OrQdii91iH0UJpL6Z6NTqQ3ETwBj_Chg8jNrg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> So, do we want this patch?
>
> I think we don't really have a lot of choice. I propose applying this
> as far back as 9.6 --- anyone think differently?
+1. If applies to 9.5 and 9.4 without a lot of work, I think we
should apply it there as well, in case there is out-of-core use of DSM
(or, in 9.5, also of ParallelContext).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Satyanarayana Narlapuram | 2017-09-25 16:23:39 | Reading backup label file for checkpoint and redo location during crash recovery |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-09-25 16:11:18 | psql \d sequence display |