| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition |
| Date: | 2017-06-13 15:53:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYKjqFPrLZxyPDE5SAb38SXv+=+_KSqN4HsUECi0Oipqw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have added tests to the
> 0001-Dependency-between-partitioned-table-and-partition_v1.patch. Please
> find attached the v2 patch.
Thanks. Committed. I don't think the 0002 patch is an improvement -
sure, it keeps those things in sync, but it also makes the code harder
to read. On balance I think it's a negative.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-13 15:55:44 | Re: RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-13 15:53:09 | Re: RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments |