| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Wait event names mismatch: oldserxid |
| Date: | 2018-02-27 19:44:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYg=v52VFa=XUWPKOGRaQkDtFXxOA8HhjVdQcs2OKsfeQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> So the docs look correct to me on this side. What I find weird is the
> phrasing to define oldserxid. Instead of that, the current description:
> Waiting to I/O on an oldserxid buffer.
> I would suggest "waiting *for* I/O"
>
> A small patch is attached.
Agreed. Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-02-27 19:50:13 | Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-02-27 19:41:47 | Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE. |