From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Avoid coercing a whole-row variable that is already coerced |
Date: | 2017-10-13 16:21:13 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYj8ynJOqnDT6ECC2uK7MT-zjj=_x8q_EJ2VnR1QG57aQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> One thing we can do is : instead of calling
> map_variable_attnos_mutator(), convert the var inside the if block for
> "if (IsA(node, ConvertRowtypeExpr))". Please check the attached patch.
> There, I have avoided coerced_var context variable.
Tom, is this more like what you have in mind?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-13 16:34:11 | Re: Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-10-13 15:58:55 | Re: Predicate Locks for writes? |