| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions |
| Date: | 2017-08-18 17:12:20 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ=342+07gzK_u-PDMbpQgauGBdpvLEZRRSCS4iU2=TSQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I think that would be much more efficient than INSERTing tuples into the
> remote server one by one. What do you think about that?
I agree, but I wonder if we ought to make it work first using the
existing APIs and then add these new APIs as an optimization.
postgres_fdw isn't the only FDW in the world, and it's better if
getting a working implementation doesn't require too many interfaces.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-18 17:31:44 | Re: Hash Functions |
| Previous Message | amul sul | 2017-08-18 17:12:02 | Re: Hash Functions |