From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Allow some recovery parameters to be changed with reload |
Date: | 2020-08-05 15:41:49 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ9i4-ob0jE1i_ZV3g-ojCOxcEPYsNZ29fSXYVN+rMpsw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 7:21 AM Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> wrote:
> So...
> We call restore_command only when walreceiver is stopped.
> We use restore_command only in startup process - so we have no race condition between processes.
> We have some issues here? Or we can just make restore_command reloadable as attached?
I don't see the problem here, either. Does anyone else see a problem,
or some reason not to press forward with this?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-05 15:49:00 | Re: Replace remaining StrNCpy() by strlcpy() |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2020-08-05 15:20:50 | Re: Yet another issue with step generation in partition pruning |