From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |
Date: | 2017-11-14 18:12:07 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZOZEB8-gWJPsA_MyJu-AT_vqojwYbLdeW+5J7S+V26dg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Here's the remaining bits, rebased.
It's true that Tom and I reviewed patch 0001, as your proposed commit
message states. But it's also true that we both said that it probably
wasn't a good idea.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-11-14 18:42:27 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-11-14 18:09:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures |