| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues with combined queries |
| Date: | 2016-12-21 03:42:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZT94brLAGK7gCmxB4mO=C-Cdz1N8KN8Xen4sexHozN=Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> Would this approach be acceptable, or is modifying Nodes a no-go area?
>
> If it is acceptable, I can probably put together a patch and submit it.
>
> If not, I suggest to update the documentation to tell that
> pg_stat_statements does not work properly with combined queries.
I think you've found a bug, but I'm a little doubtful about your
proposed fix. However, I haven't studied the code, so I don't know
what other approach might be better.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-21 04:03:13 | Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-12-21 03:31:56 | Re: Logical decoding on standby |