| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans? |
| Date: | 2017-11-15 13:28:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa=AxuLKo2f1AKwLmvFoo3rr3j+SYHaJ5GVyx1PhhOJ0Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks. You're right. Rebased and updated to describe what "off" does.
Committed. I noticed that you didn't add the new GUC to
postgresql.conf.sample, so I did that. But then I thought it didn't
really belong in the section you put it, so I moved it to
RESOURCES_ASYNCHRONOUS.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2017-11-15 13:35:26 | Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-11-15 13:13:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |