| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions |
| Date: | 2017-07-10 21:56:09 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa=uq7CbL9Ry2gKeGQE9LpD0X8wCzE4nkfcC0PKu5xKHQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> So, I dropped the COPY part.
Ouch. I think we should try to figure out how the COPY part will be
handled before we commit to a design.
I have to admit that I'm a little bit fuzzy about why foreign insert
routing requires all of these changes. I think this patch would
benefit from being accompanied by several paragraphs of explanation
outlining the rationale for each part of the patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-07-10 22:33:34 | Re: New partitioning - some feedback |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-07-10 21:44:27 | Re: Oddity in error handling of constraint violation in ExecConstraints for partitioned tables |