| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Hubert Zhang <hzhang(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Considering signal handling in plpython again |
| Date: | 2018-05-10 14:59:16 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaVcke33Kj=WDUER63A=fP-+F1vTO8qM4rLAsVeOqxHFA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> I came up with the attached patch, which is similar to Mario's, but it
> introduces a new "hook" for this.
I'd rather have the hook be executed whenever ProcessInterrupts() is
called, rather than only in the query-cancel case.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-05-10 15:57:25 | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-05-10 14:50:06 | Re: Considering signal handling in plpython again |