From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrey Borodin <amborodin(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: background sessions |
Date: | 2016-12-12 13:54:13 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoagottDtLDXUGLNqSJ1o1teC1dbML+TETZe9FFU1BiNTQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Andrew Borodin <borodin(at)octonica(dot)com> wrote:
> 1. As far as I can see, we connot use COPY FROM STDIN in bg session?
> Since one of purposes is to orchestrate transactions, may be that
> would be valuable.
A background worker has no client connection, so what would COPY FROM STDIN do?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-12-12 14:01:53 | Re: jacana hung after failing to acquire random number |
Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2016-12-12 13:50:46 | [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type |