From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql |
Date: | 2017-04-04 13:45:26 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoathxbFZyi1EphhRyLFKjHbTVDj-qT77FdkX9Vy1p_2Nw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> 0002 looks extremely straightforward, but I wonder if we could get one
>> of the people on this list who knows about sepgsql to have a look?
>> (Stephen Frost, Joe Conway, KaiGai Kohei...)
>
> Will have a look later today.
I think it is now tomorrow, unless your time zone is someplace very
far away. :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-04-04 13:52:17 | Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-04-04 13:43:15 | Re: Re: PATCH: pageinspect / add page_checksum and bt_page_items(bytea) |