| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The case for removing replacement selection sort |
| Date: | 2017-09-07 21:49:21 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobdEW0FKon7y53317WQ8ujaetJ1kOao+a-=q=GqHyba+w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Do we need/want to repeat some of that benchmarking on these patches? I
> don't recall how much this code changed since those benchmarks were done
> in the 9.6 cycle.
+1 for some new benchmarking. I'm all for removing this code if we
don't need it any more, but it'd be a lot better to have more numbers
before deciding that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-09-07 21:49:59 | Re: GnuTLS support |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-09-07 21:48:18 | Re: Parallel worker error |