From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes |
Date: | 2017-03-24 07:49:59 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JPWawfhB655sM9CBxcWNB2hYXPTkFN1JhmYeNqCP+SaA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I think it would have been probably okay to use *int* for ntuples as
>> that matches with what you are actually assigning in the function.
>
> okay, corrected it. Attached is newer version of patch.
>
Thanks, this version looks good to me.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Khandekar | 2017-03-24 07:53:01 | Re: Parallel Append implementation |
Previous Message | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi | 2017-03-24 07:41:54 | Re: Parallel Append implementation |