| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WAL usage calculation patch) |
| Date: | 2020-04-07 08:42:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KRQnZnCwONuVpc6o=GjXU_vRcUfL-MEOWBKA-jzT7fvA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 1:30 PM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Buffer usage statistics seem correct. The small differences would be
> catalog lookups Peter mentioned.
>
Agreed, but can you check which part of code does that lookup? I want
to see if we can avoid that from buffer usage stats or at least write
a comment about it, otherwise, we might have to face this question
again and again.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | 曾文旌 | 2020-04-07 08:51:01 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-04-07 08:17:32 | Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI. |