| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path |
| Date: | 2020-08-03 09:05:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvqWaQvzUPrPMZ7vYcVwzRFP+zbQwhdQ630xgUVBj0O2Wg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 19:54, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Worth noting that the patch set fails to apply. I have moved this
> entry to the next CF, waiting on author.
Thanks.
NB: It's not a patch set. It's 3 different versions of the patch.
They're not all meant to apply at once. Probably the CF bot wasn't
aware of that though :-(
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-08-03 09:17:56 | Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs? |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2020-08-03 09:05:38 | Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..." |