| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Use of RangeVar for partitioned tables in autovacuum |
| Date: | 2017-09-28 05:17:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQaGC9sGnZ4q-meeR4FXeB_P44--P9G9E5faYz_dEz+jw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In conclusion, I think that the open item of $subject should be
> removed from the list, and we should try to get the multi-VACUUM patch
> in to cover any future problems. I'll do so if there are no
> objections.
And done. Moved to the non-bug section.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-09-28 05:20:34 | Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2017-09-28 04:58:33 | Re: path toward faster partition pruning |