| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync |
| Date: | 2017-10-27 07:03:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQpswBAuNPsJXM+Nj=-bqC2L2vCdUZVf6Bx98C90p2msQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> This sentence is actually wrong, a feedback message is never sent with
>> the feedback message.
>
> Eh?
"A feedback message is never sent depending on the status interval".
> I think this looks basically fine, though I'd omit the short option
> for it. There are only so many letters in the alphabet, so let's not
> use them up for developer-convenience options.
No objections to that.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2017-10-27 07:34:08 | Typos in src/backend/optimizer/README |
| Previous Message | Gaddam Sai Ram | 2017-10-27 06:23:56 | Re: CurTransactionContext freed before transaction COMMIT ??? |