| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allowing SSL connection of v11 client to v10 server with SCRAM channel binding |
| Date: | 2017-12-08 22:45:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRd4wJ=5i==0aAtHMrD6x5B7LKfGCFpyaNjmKfnsCee1Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/1/17 18:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Cool. Thanks. For REL_10_STABLE, I would suggest the attached patch
>> then. This ensures that eSws is checked in the final message and that
>> the cbind-flag sent in the first message maps with the data of the
>> final message in the backend. I have checked with the following
>> configurations with a v10 backend:
>> - v11 libpq with SSL
>> - v11 libpq without SSL
>> - v10 libpq with SSL
>> - v10 libpq without SSL
>> And in all cases the connection is accepted as it should.
>
> Committed.
Thanks.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | legrand legrand | 2017-12-08 22:55:53 | Re: Partition-wise aggregation/grouping |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-12-08 22:42:13 | Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY |