| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zhang Zq <zqzhangmail(at)163(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG in XLogRecordAssemble |
| Date: | 2015-05-04 17:16:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRqQDCjGpJvjiezd5tQ4O==C8DDWNmaAWZPDxw+CF4WZw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Zhang Zq <zqzhangmail(at)163(dot)com> wrote:
> There is the only place that prev_regbuf is assigned, so prev_regbuf will
> never be assigned.
> The patch will fix it, Thanks.
Indeed. I think you are right. We never set prev_regbuf with the current code.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergey Grinko | 2015-05-04 17:27:00 | Re: Loss of some parts of the function definition |
| Previous Message | Sandro Santilli | 2015-05-04 17:11:35 | Unexpected speed PLAIN vs. MAIN |