| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: CLUSTER command progress monitor |
| Date: | 2017-09-06 07:11:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS4eRdfXr8+PgJp3ot6WGKs5+uDDtxpCnKrLwhJGi=LhQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Tatsuro Yamada
<yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I revised the patch like this:
You should avoid top-posting.
> I didn't change the name of view (pg_stat_progress_cluster) because I'm not
> sure
> whether the new name (pg_stat_progress_reorg) is suitable or not.
Here are some ideas: rewrite (incorrect for ALTER TABLE), organize
(somewhat fine), order, operate (too general?), bundle, reform,
assemble.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rushabh Lathia | 2017-09-06 07:36:06 | Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-09-06 07:08:24 | Re: paths in partitions of a dummy partitioned table |