| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Hadi Moshayedi <hadi(at)citusdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range of object drops. |
| Date: | 2017-11-30 03:33:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSFytTZrXgZQzqrduEZqcR91LcMgxOFZovHzcd-L6-aDQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> +1,
> FDW looks OK for prototyping pluggable storage, but it doesn't seem suitable
> for permanent implementation.
> BTW, Hadi, could you visit "Pluggable storage" thread and check how suitable
> upcoming pluggable storage API is for cstore?
I cannot make a clear opinion about this patch. Not changing the
situation, or changing it have both downsides and upsides. The
suggestion from Alexander is surely something to look at. I am bumping
this to next CF for now..
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-30 03:35:06 | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-11-30 03:32:14 | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |