| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations |
| Date: | 2017-11-30 02:16:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTGQKP_ENwv+YG7H_+5ZzS_zYyPai3uCrqkfCf2H7etJQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik
<k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Concerning broken partition_join test: it is "expected" failure: my patch
> removes from the plans redundant checks.
> So the only required action is to update expected file with results.
> Attached please find updated patch.
The last patch version has conflicts in regression tests and did not
get any reviews. Please provide a rebased version. I am moving the
patch to next CF with waiting on author as status. Thanks!
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-30 02:18:11 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-30 02:15:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping |