| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c? |
| Date: | 2017-09-25 01:01:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTqdy_dsWJ=oU=BTyv_Wfpo5STapS4Kv701wj94eAHEDw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On a related note, the idea of removing pg_standby altogether has been
> proposed a few times. Apparently there are a few things that it still
> does better than standby_mode, but nobody seems in a hurry to do
> anything about that. Still, I'd be against spending a lot of time
> trying to improve a tool that has mostly outlived its usefulness - we
> ought to be trying to enhance the in-core facilities instead.
+1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-09-25 03:10:50 | Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations |
| Previous Message | Nathan Wagner | 2017-09-25 00:52:43 | Re: Fix number skipping in to_number |