| From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
| Date: | 2020-08-28 08:43:58 |
| Message-ID: | CACPNZCvw4T1ideXrLAzgfzvKj_=LmxW8=KKd_UNFVhOWct-+RQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:04 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm a bit inclined to kill them both off and standardize on factorial()
> (not numeric_fac).
+1
--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2020-08-28 08:44:54 | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-08-28 08:42:39 | Re: Display individual query in pg_stat_activity |