| From: | Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types |
| Date: | 2018-06-04 12:47:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAE2gYzx1vgw1egmdmHHogKK57W67H3QYTb+tBP4G7Y3TkCRqdw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> But now I'm wondering what does this mean for existing indexes? Doesn't this
> effectively mean those are unlikely to give meaningful responses (in the old
> or new semantics)?
The patches shouldn't cause any change to the indexable operators.
The fixes are mostly around the lines and the line segments which
doesn't have index support.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2018-06-04 13:13:44 | Re: New committers announced at PGCon 2018 |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-06-04 12:05:55 | Re: Problem while updating a foreign table pointing to a partitioned table on foreign server |