| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 10: could not generate random cancel key |
| Date: | 2018-07-18 13:07:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAEZATCW4tvjBqpWzxzhPnBa0WMSqS3uCeXGy+iFaDX+ThAVW4w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18 July 2018 at 14:01, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Thanks for the updated version. This looks safer to me. It is possible
> to simplify the code by removing the external RAND_status() call and
> check for RAND_status() first in the loop as per the attached.
OK, thanks.
Barring any further comments, I'll push and back-patch this to v10
later this week.
Regards,
Dean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-07-18 13:29:01 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-07-18 13:06:22 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |