| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |
| Date: | 2017-06-02 13:20:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=1HeXoKEUjaWgHEncVe6yJonhzFtgX21SA_cO9CP2dNfA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I would have expected that to be handled by separate transition tables
> at different query levels, but evidently it isn't.
I am wondering if we need to wrap the execution of a modifying CTE in
AfterTriggerBeginQuery() and AfterTriggerEndQuery(). But I'm not sure
where, and it may be a couple of days before I can dig some more.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-02 13:27:41 | Re: Perfomance bug in v10 |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-06-02 13:15:20 | Re: Effect of changing the value for PARALLEL_TUPLE_QUEUE_SIZE |