| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2017-03-10 08:36:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=3zS1_FB0zCcLYXtcaLNpX1P+Q6_A8=J-jk64pnFassQg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Can you come up with an halfway realistic scenario why an index oid, not
> a table, constraint, sequence oid, would be relied upon?
Is there an implication for SIREAD locks? Predicate locks on index
pages include the index OID in the tag.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Michálek | 2017-03-10 08:43:30 | Re: Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-03-10 08:35:39 | Re: Parallel Append implementation |