| From: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
|---|---|
| To: | chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net |
| Cc: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions |
| Date: | 2018-06-12 15:09:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAEzk6fd=MA2Dw6PWuND29sRzATf96CeqB=_tBerg3HayXk8-Aw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 15:44, Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> wrote:
> > I did wonder about "NO CHECK" but wasn't sure if having two words
> > would make the parser change more complex.
>
> DEFERRED?
That's a good shout. I wouldn't mind either of those choices.
So can I assume at least that no-one has an objection to the general principle?
I don't currently have a PG dev environment set up so it's non-trivial
for me to implement, which I'm ok with but not if I'm just wasting my
(and everyone else's) time :)
Cheers
Geoff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-06-12 15:15:38 | Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-12 14:56:56 | Re: BUG #15237: I got "ERROR: source for a multiple-column UPDATE item must be a sub-SELECT or ROW() expression" |