From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump |
Date: | 2018-06-16 08:36:55 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-s2kNct+PbrwyKjXXVOyDFrFjjoFS+_DtWEOrF7rsWeXQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> thank you for pointing me that i add basic test and it seems to me the rest
> of the test is covered by column_inserts test
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ typedef struct _dumpOptions
char *outputSuperuser;
int sequence_data; /* dump sequence data even in schema-only mode */
+ int do_nothing;
} DumpOptions;
The new structure member appears out of place, can you move up along
with other "command-line long options" ?
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-06-16 09:38:59 | Re: WAL prefetch |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2018-06-16 05:44:20 | Re: Memory leaks in BufFileOpenShared() |