| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum launcher occurs error when cancelled by SIGINT |
| Date: | 2017-06-21 14:22:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-t9LO3po0RPZ3bMMQo6BbCo99d4z2w02BOJD3RXyv31wA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> IMHO, It's not a good idea to use DSM call to verify the DSA handle.
>>
> Okay. Is there any particular scenario you've in mind where this may fail?
It's not about failure, but about the abstraction. When we are using
the DSA we should not directly access the DSM which is under DSA.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yugo Nagata | 2017-06-21 14:30:48 | Re: Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-06-21 14:19:21 | Re: Broken hint bits (freeze) |