| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Вадим Горбачев <bmsdave(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal GSoC 2015 task: Allow access to the database via HTTP |
| Date: | 2015-03-25 05:51:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRA++8VkFB2Kb-0-BMi8S+jpD_bBeCTUYRQh92Ec8KWLSg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-03-24 21:19 GMT+01:00 Вадим Горбачев <bmsdave(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> I came across correspondences:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjNrYu+Z1KfKt1..44K4pG69ou7fuHOw@mail.gmail.com
>
> http://www .
> posatgresql.org/message-id/9A28C8860F777E439AA12E8AEA7694F8FB8EAD@BPXM15GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
> as I understand, in this https://github.com/dobesv/restgres/project the
> idea of bgworker'a which listens to the specified port is already realized
> and processes http-inquiries = (
>
> why then this task still is in the TODO sheet?
>
because it is not in upstream yet ?
Pavel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2015-03-25 05:53:23 | Re: Zero-padding and zero-masking fixes for to_char(float) |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-03-25 05:32:50 | Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config |