From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Amcheck: do rightlink verification with lock coupling |
Date: | 2020-08-03 22:44:34 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=Jn-_muYc9fV0t_W8hqsui85b6u46_xOWFMhtgge6KJw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:46 AM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
> In this thread [0] we decided that lock coupling is necessary for btree_xlog_unlink_page().
> So, maybe let's revive this patch?
Yes, let's do that. Can you resubmit it, please?
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-08-03 22:55:36 | Re: [PATCH] Btree BackwardScan race condition on Standby during VACUUM |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2020-08-03 22:44:03 | Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88% |