From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Subject: | Re: pgbench stuck with 100% cpu usage |
Date: | 2017-09-29 18:37:05 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkR3eHHidsA0AqiQ_h8J5iYeKS=Q5MPFmjCCFc01maDsw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, I think it's a very legitimate test, not for testing performance, but
> testing crash recovery and I use it very often. This particular test was run
> to catch another bug which will be reported separately.
Yeah, I use pgbench for stuff like that all the time.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Schneider | 2017-09-29 19:20:52 | Re: [HACKERS] User-perspective knowledge about wait events |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-09-29 18:22:46 | Re: pgbench stuck with 100% cpu usage |