From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Boom filters for hash joins (was: A design for amcheck heapam verification) |
Date: | 2017-09-19 16:03:43 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzn+xeU+CsrinrSBj014zmKCicbccAn-WmRe=Xx_VuFBpQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The patch is fairly simple, and did not try to push the bloom filters to
> scan nodes or anything like that. It might be a meaningful first step,
> though, particularly for selective joins (where only small number of
> rows from the outer relation has a match in the hash table).
I believe that parallelism makes the use of Bloom filter a lot more
compelling, too. Obviously this is something that wasn't taken into
consideration in 2015.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-09-19 16:10:12 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Perform only one ReadControlFile() during startup. |
Previous Message | 'Bruce Momjian' | 2017-09-19 15:56:45 | Re: PG 10 release notes |