| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
| Date: | 2018-04-06 17:42:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzn4N7HP4DS6Bzvd7hiozOseReu7mV1PftrUhANSCgUCRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Thinking about that again, I found that we should relax our requirements to
> "minus infinity" items, because pg_upgraded indexes doesn't have any
> special bits set for those items.
>
> What do you think about applying following patch on the top of v14?
It's clearly necessary. Looks fine to me.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-06 17:43:00 | Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-04-06 17:40:59 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |