From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: _bt_delitems_delete() should use XLogRegisterBufData(), not XLogRegisterData() |
Date: | 2020-01-02 21:41:25 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wznr4tjtfbyoqT4xYQ6FOsnsbcjo7F4w4xbB7-OxJS+=-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:00 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Attached patch shows what I have in mind. The new comment block has
> been copied from _bt_delitems_vacuum().
I also think that the WAL record and function signature of
_bt_delitems_delete() should be brought closer to
_bt_delitems_vacuum(). Attached patch does it that way.
I intend to commit this in the next day or two, barring any objections.
--
Peter Geoghegan
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Associate-LP_DEAD-offsets-with-WAL-record-s-buffe.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | cary huang | 2020-01-02 21:46:44 | Re: Setting min/max TLS protocol in clientside libpq |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-01-02 21:07:57 | Re: Recognizing superuser in pg_hba.conf |