| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter |
| Date: | 2017-04-09 10:14:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f8YiZ_KaXtW-35Yk704qSugJvZp3Kfmoz4+T9n+nL91EA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8 April 2017 at 09:33, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Otherwise, the patch LGTM, but I'd like to solve the quadratic
> behavior too... are you going to try? Otherwise I could take a stab at
> it myself. It doesn't seem very difficult.
I have some ideas in my head in a fairly generic way of solving this
which I'd like to take care of in PG11.
Many thanks for your reviews and suggestions on this patch, it's much
appreciated.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Banck | 2017-04-09 11:22:02 | Re: Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requested and not yet present |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-04-09 09:25:31 | Re: Interval for launching the table sync worker |