| From: | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join |
| Date: | 2017-09-05 11:55:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAKcux6=aPQbPScsA-8v7cD=yjNOGWAnvEnJ1cQ6zNjoWH30jEQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <
ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I have fixed the issues which were marked as TODOs in the attached
> patches. Also, I have included your test change patch in my series of
> patches. Are there any other issues you have commented out?
>
> Thanks Ashutosh, All commented issue got fixed. I am working on some
combinations of N-way joins
to test partition matching, will send those as well once done.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-09-05 11:57:20 | Re: Replacing lfirst() with lfirst_node() appropriately in planner.c |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2017-09-05 11:47:55 | Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |